Become our Friend on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Font Size: +A -A RESET
Midway 'tween GA's
Written by Jack Haberer, Outlook Editor   
Sunday, 28 June 2009 23:58

Midway – adv.: in the middle of the way or distance; halfway.

Midway – n.: 1. an avenue at a fair or circus where rides, entertainment, and booths are concentrated; 2. a 2.4 square mile atoll in the north Pacific, approximately one-half the distance between the U.S. mainland and Asia; 3. a World War II battle fought around, on, and in the air over that atoll, which became the turning point of the war in the Pacific; 4. a retired U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, which is now a memorial ship in San Diego; 5. the early summer of 2009, halfway in time between the San Jose General Assembly of 2008 and the Minneapolis GA of 2010.

Welcome to the Midway, on its way to Minneapolis. How’d we get here? And, where are we going? 

On the surface, these questions answer themselves. We got here by being adjourned from the San Jose General Assembly on June 28, 2008, and by jotting on our calendars the Minneapolis GA to be convened July 3, 2010. We stand halfway between those dates and locations. 

That’s too obvious. One begs to ask, “Where are we now?” … from the perspective of where we’ve been and where we’re headed down this avenue. 

One could say that, given the practice of going around and around the same issues, our once-tidy show has turned into a circus, even a three-ring circus. But such a metaphor misses the nuances of change that have emerged even in our repetitiveness.

Perhaps we’ve morphed into a fair – where barkers and concessionaires shout for attention, and where quiet clowns catch our eye by deception. The concentration of issues debated by us are rivaled only by the number of persuasive styles being utilized — all for the sake of waging a noble battle “for the hearts and minds” of church and world. Yet, the tone of debate has softened while the content has become more straightforward than in years past.

We could wax cynical: we are fighting a pitched battle for the control of a denomination that resembles less a continent than an atoll sitting unassumingly in the middle of nowhere.

Metaphors aside, we do find ourselves on board our SS Midway amid a journey, a sea voyage. Oops, that’s a metaphor, too. Ah, well. 

This journey, if we could summarize it at its biennial midpoint, feels different than recent “’tween-GA years” interims. On the one hand the presbyteries have been voting their way to a near tie on the most contested topic of this era: whether the church can and should legitimize monogamous, same-sex partnering among its ordained leadership. Yet, in most of the 173 presbyteries, the discussions proceeded with civility, with prayerfulness, with a searching desire to discern God’s will, and with mutual respect. Through the process, cries about the falling sky actually softened like a Mozart decrescendo.

Yes, some churches did continue the exodus provoked by the New Wineskins movement, yet through the first nine-and-a-half years of this century, just 38 churches have left the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) for alternative affiliations (about one-third of one percent of our congregations). Our ears to the ground report that as many as 40 additional congregations are contemplating an exit strategy, but in comparison to the nearly 11,000 worshiping communities staying put, well, the battlefields are as few and far between as remote Pacific islands.

In the meantime, much work is being done. Task forces are studying many difficult issues, as you will read about in this edition of the Outlook. But for the most part, the conversations are proceeding with good will among folks of shared faith seeking to live out their mutual commitment to fulfill their baptismal covenant together. Actions coming from our national offices keep evidencing common sense and a general disinterest in foolishness. And, more than anything else, folks in pulpits and pews are aiming to live as missional Christians and are exercising those efforts within connectional relationships through their regions – especially as organized in presbyteries. 

Have we reached a turning point? Only time can answer that question. Many turning points are needed for us to become the transformed, world-changing company of the redeemed that Christ Jesus constituted. But at this midway point, we seem to be proceeding in the right direction.

           

—    JHH

Trackback(0)
Your Responses (3)Add Comment
Response from Bobbie McGarey, July 02, 2009
duncan,Ok
Dear Jack, I very much appreciated your article and the way your work with the Outlook has continued to make this a valued resourse in so many ways for us all.
It seems that we so easily want to break off to we/they and I just keep thinking that 'they' is a 4-letter word that is often so destructive.
Yes, the church is changing...it always has as an organic entity.
Again Thank you
Response from John Erthein, June 30, 2009
Erie, Pa
I have three counter-points to your article:
First, is it the New Wineskins Movement or larger denominational decisions that have "provoked" the exodus of churches from the PC(USA)? Did the NWAC appear in a vacuum?

Second, how many congregations would have left or would leave the PC(USA) if they held their own property, as is the practice in at least two other Presbyterian denominations (I am thinking of the PCA and EPC specifically)? In our current system, some congregations may not leave because it is too much of a hassle, or they don't want to risk losing everything they have built up over the years. In a related point, majorities of some congregations have left, but because the building stays within the PC(USA), the "congregation" is not recorded as leaving, even though most of the members have indeed left. First Church of Paola comes to mind.

Third, while I recognize that members leave or drop out for a variety of reasons (not all of them theological), it is very difficult to understand how the PC(USA) can be "proceeding in the right direction" after huge membership losses in this decade ... nearly 70,000 in 2008 alone. One would think that if we were proceeding in the right direction, membership losses might decrease, if not stop entirely. Instead, they are accelerating.

Overall, Jack, I think you are painting way too rosy a portrait of the current state of the PC(USA).

John Erthein
Erie, Pa.



The editor responds:

John, you’re a good friend. I respect you and appreciate how your frequent letters graciously affirm points of agreement and boldly challenge points of disagreement. You add a lot to the ongoing conversations the Outlook is trying to foster in the church. Regarding the issues raised in this letter…

1. I attended the New Wineskins convocation in February 2007, where

· their chosen keynote speaker, Parker Williamson, declared of the PC(USA), “This dysfunctional ecclesiastical organization is not a church, for the marks of the church are gone,”

· almost every workshop was led by lawyers teaching participants how to plan ahead their fight for church property as they secede from the denomination,

· most of the national staff of the Evangelical Presbyterian Church mixed with the crowd and invited the attendees to come to their hospitality room to talk about life in that denomination, and

· the NWAC member congregations’ delegates voted to encourage their likeminded colleagues to leave the PC(USA) together to form a transitional presbytery of the EPC.

Yes, they also affirmed that staying in the PC(USA), “If God calls you to do that,” can be a responsible alternative, but the clear emphasis pointed toward a pull out (some of those not intending to secede complained openly that they were being treated as second class New Wineskins).

You may well declare that the PC(USA) decisions and actions have provoked churches to leave, but then again, you also could claim that the Securities and Exchange Commission created the Madoff investments fraud. The PC(USA) is not innocent any more than the SEC, but like Madoff, the NWAC conceived and formulated a detailed strategy to encourage and facilitate a mass movement of secession from the denomination. To pass the buck to Louisville and, thereby, feign innocence in provoking schism is laughable.

2. Regarding congregations that might leave if they controlled their property, no doubt more would have left. Our secular, godless culture is individualistic, localist, disconnectional; it glorifies autonomy, it prefers pure democracy to representative democracy (per Alvin Toffler), and wants nobody to “tread on me.” Hence, for local congregations to seek the freedom to “do their own thing,” disregarding the covenantal, Presbyterian structure, simply reflects the times in which we live. Indeed, some former PC(USA) churches that joined the EPC and/or the NWAC have already taken the further step of going totally independent. No doubt, the PC(USA) has capitulated to many secular cultural influences — to its shame. Should we capitulate to this other cultural influence just because two schismatic denominations have done so?

3. Is the editorial’s assessment of PC(USA) too rosy? The editorial at hand asks if we have reached a turning point. Asking such a question implies that a turning point is needed. In fact, this and many other preceding editorials have declared that we need to change many things we are doing in pursuit of a major turnaround, to be faithful to the Gospel. The editorial expressed hope that some recent actions appear to be heading in the right direction (we do believe in the resurrection, after all), but it hardly qualifies as being rosy.


Jack Haberer
Response from T. Walters, June 29, 2009
Seguin, Texas
Perhaps. But I think a more likely future is an acceleration of member and church losses after gay/lesbian ordination passes in 2010. Some churches will fight to leave. More will just quietly wither away as traditional members say sad goodbyes. The liberal wing knows it is about to win a 40 year fight. And the conservative wing senses it coming, too. The national PCUSA leadership is trying to sound less like the fully partisan player it is, on the liberal side, and more like a soothing voice
seeking common ground, trying to avoid triumphalism, at least in public, trying to stem the coming tide. A wise strategy, but transparent. Louisville knows what comes next. But it won't be able to restrain liberals from moving on to the next item on their agenda: gay marriage. Michael Adee and the New Light Presbyterians make no secret of it. In 2012, or shortly therafter, expect an amendment to require all PCUSA churches to be made available for gay/lesbian ceremonies. We're on a fairly straight line to becoming a boutique Protestant denomination of 1-1.5 million, mostly urban, east coast, left coast members, that look like the liberal wing of the Democratic party at prayer. (To reverse the old phrase of the early 20th century Episcopal church as the Republican party at prayer.) The Presbyterian "brand" will no longer be sellable in large parts of the South and some parts of the Midwest and West. That's not an unhappy outcome for many of the "winners," who view the losses as sore losers, unenlightened, diminished by their choice to leave. (Surprise ending: I voted for President Obama and worshipped and ate lunch for 3 years with two great guys and good friends of our family, Ed and AJ, interior decorators ! And yes, they were, though we practiced Don't Ask, Don't Tell before it became law.)

Write a Response
smaller | bigger
NOTE: Your response to an article will be reviewed by staff before it is made available to the public for reading. The delay may be a few minutes or it may be as long as 24 hours.

busy
 
Banner
Join Our News Alerts Mailing List
Email:
Banner
Banner
Banner