Become our Friend on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Font Size: +A -A RESET
General Assembly approves Theological Task Force PUP report
Written by Leslie Scanlon   
Monday, 10 July 2006 12:00

BIRMINGHAM -- Now the question is: What happens next?

A closely divided General Assembly has voted to try something new -- to try an approach of balancing freedom of conscience while applying national ordination standards that some say has the chance to bring healing to the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and others say could help break the denomination apart.

BIRMINGHAM -- Now the question is: What happens next?

A closely divided General Assembly has voted to try something new -- to try an approach of balancing freedom of conscience while applying national ordination standards that some say has the chance to bring healing to the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and others say could help break the denomination apart.

The assembly voted 298 to 221 on June 20 to approve the report of the Theological Task Force on the Peace, Unity and Purity of the PC(USA) -- one of the most closely-watched and controversial items to come before the assembly in years.

That means the assembly has just created a new authoritative interpretation -- an interpretation which would permit a candidate who disagrees with part of the church's ordination standards, such as those involving the ordination of gays and lesbians, to declare an objection or a "scruple." The local governing body would then decide whether that departure from the denomination's constitutional standards "constitutes a failure to adhere to the essentials of Reformed faith and polity," or can be tolerated.

"We have not in any way fundamentally changed our standards relative to ordination and human sexuality," said PC(USA) stated clerk Clifton Kirkpatrick during a news conference. But he said he hopes there will now be "a more pastoral spirit as we uphold those standards."

Evangelicals in the church, however, contend that the assembly's vote does effectively change the constitution.

"The consequences of the decision of this General Assembly throw our denomination into crisis," said Terry Schlossberg, executive director of the Presbyterian Coalition. Some will conclude that the PC(USA) has "abandoned the historic faith," she said -- and some in the worldwide church will see the decision as "profoundly offensive."

The Covenant Network of Presbyterians, on the other hand, said that in approving the report "the General Assembly has called the church to a higher standard of life together."

The task force worked on the report for four years and was unanimous in its recommendations -- an accomplishment that, given the committee's diversity, some have called a miracle.

And the assembly gave strong support, by a 459-41 vote, or more than 91 percent in favor, to the task force's first four recommendations -- including the recommendation that the task force has said is its most significant: that PC(USA) should not split into separate denominations.

The task force also has asked -- and the assembly strongly affirmed -- that congregations, presbyteries and other groups should "follow the example of the task force" and use processes of discernment and community building to work through difficult issues.

And that section of the report includes theological statements about Jesus Christ and the Bible that have been praised across the spectrum -- indeed, task force members have said over and over that, despite their differences about the church's political issues, they found common ground on areas such as Christology and Biblical authority and interpretation.

But the votes of the assembly commissioners also reflected how conflicted the denomination continues to be about the authoritative interpretation. During an afternoon of discussion, the assembly cast a series of votes regarding the report that reflect a split of about 55 percent to 45 percent. A move to reject the authoritative interpretation lost by a vote of 287 to 234.

Following the vote, at the request of moderator Joan Gray, the commissioners stood and joined hands in silent prayer. Almost immediately after that, a commissioner rose to ask how he could do something he had hoped he'd never have to do -- to put into the record his official dissent with the vote the assembly had just taken.

Kirkpatrick described the task force's success as "for some extremely good news, for others extremely painful news," and said a letter would be sent that could be read in every Presbyterian congregation on Sunday, "so that people could at least hear from us" about what the denomination has done.

The task force has said its report can give the church a "season of discernment" in which the PC(USA)'s ordination standards won't change ---- but congregations and presbyteries can decide when applying those standards when it's appropriate to grant exceptions. Regarding sexual behavior, the ordination standards restrict ordination to those who practice fidelity if they're married or chastity if they're single.

Through more than two hours of debate on the task force report, commissioners came to the microphones in a steady stream -- on this one, seemingly everyone had an opinion.

Zoe VanDyke, a youth advisory delegate from Scioto Valley presbytery, said she sees "an epidemic of conflict in the church," and wants it to stop.

But David Miller, a pastor from Florida, called the new authoritative interpretation a "license to overlook" the ordination standards. And Robert Gagnon, an elder from Pittsburgh, said the assembly's action "will not bring unity but will actually take the conflict that exists at the national level and extend it to every single congregation and every single presbytery."

Gray was asked whether she thinks the assembly acted in accordance with Scripture.

"We're struggling with that as a denomination," she said. "We have not yet come to one mind totally on this. We're still working on it."

Trackback(0)
Your Responses (6)Add Comment
Response from Joon Lee, June 21, 2006
Pastor, Korean Presbyterian Church of Columbus
I watched the livecast on Tuesday during the business meeting. I was stunned to hear Rev. Syngman Rhee saying that the Korean churches were not leaving the denomination even if the recommendation was to be approved. Let me assure all of you. He was NOT representing the Korean Presbyteran churches within PCUSA. Most of the Korean churches in PCUSA (more than 98%) oppose ordination of homosexuals though we love them and accept them as members.

The National Korean Presbyterian Council (NKPC), a body consisted of Korean churches within PCUSA, has officially published in its newsletter to its members a couple months ago that it recommends to disapprove PUP Report's Recommendation #5.

Rev. Syngman Rhee is not representing the Korean brothers and sisters. What he said during the GA session was totally his own personal opinion.

Now it's a time for Korean churches to consider which step we need to take once the decision was made in the GA.
Response from Jonathan Fettig, June 21, 2006
Pastor, First Presbyterian Church
I find the argument that our ordination standards have remained intact to be intentionally deceptive. While technically true, this argument ignores the very real path that has been opened to go around those standards. It is as though a homeowner is arguing that 'my fence is intact,' while a bridge has just been created for the purpose of walking over it. I am deeply saddened by this decision.
Response from Jonathan Fettig, June 21, 2006
Pastor, First Presbyterian Church
I find the argument that our ordination standards have remained intact to be intentionally deceptive. While technically true, this argument ignores the very real path that has been opened to go around those standards. It is as though a homeowner is arguing that 'my fence is intact,' while a bridge has just been created for the purpose of walking over it. I am deeply saddened by this decision.
Response from Greg Wiest, June 21, 2006
Pastor Glade Run Church
Now what? That is the question. Beaver-Butler had an overture that tried to answer that question precisely. It was the flexible membership overture. It would have allowed churches in the minority that agreed or disagreed with the application of recommendation 5 to move to another presbytery. The committee on polity is not recommending this. Unless the GA decides to do differently, the only option now for churches in disagreement is to leave the PCUSA. Perhaps there will still be time to give churches or presbyteries an option.
gandlwiest@yahoo.com
Response from Martin Shelton-Jenck, June 21, 2006
The real issue
Once again we have dealt with an issue. I am satisfied that the assembly and the task force have done the best they could given the divisions to search for the peace, unity, and purity of the church for today. 2 years from now everything may change since the issue will continue for many years. Unfortunately no one in the denomination seems to really care about the most important issue...we are dieing and that is not because of the issue that we like to fight about. With Kirkpatrick's prediction that we will be down 85,000 members by next year, we just slowly die away as we scream louder about issues that even if resolved will not resurrect the church. Unless a real resurrection begins within the hearts and minds of this family of God in the local congregations, our overall denomination will cease to matter. We may become like unprogrammed Quakers, very small and very effective on matters of peace and justice. Or we may become like the Shakers, a footnote in Christian history. Hopefully our church can begin to focus on the great ends of the church and develop metrics that will help us set individual congregational goals that we can all strive for. Without those goals and a renewal of executive leadership within congregation, we may legislate ourselves into oblivion. Goals such as how many members in our local congregations are worshipping weekly? Is that increasing or not? Why? Or how many members are serving weekly in their communities in works of compassion, justice, and peace? Or is the educational programming for lifelong growth in faith reaching more people this year? At the same time, executive leadership is a lost forgotten tradition in the church today, only legislative leadership carries the day. And traditionally, legislative leaders don't make good executives. Barth used to say that he held the bible in one hand and the newspaper in the other as he prepared for preaching. Today we need the bible, the internet, and Jim Collin's Good To Great For The Social Sectors. Do we have three hands? Is this a trinitarian moment?
Response from Jane Williams, June 20, 2006
Elder, First Presbyterina LaFollette
It is with great sorrow and sadness that I read that the GA has passed such a drastic change of our constitution with such a weak majority. Anything this monumental should have at least 75% approval. I pray that the Holy Spirit, who has led us against these propositions for 20 years, will help us derive some good out of this grievous decision. I would rather be devided in Truth as united in error...so it looks like the PCUSA cares NOT for a large percentage of Presyterians.

God have mercy upon us all.
Jane C. Williams
200 Ellison Road # 1
LaFollette, TN 37766-3042

Write a Response
smaller | bigger
NOTE: Your response to an article will be reviewed by staff before it is made available to the public for reading. The delay may be a few minutes or it may be as long as 24 hours.

busy
 
Banner
Join Our News Alerts Mailing List
Email:
Banner
Banner
Banner