Comments for New Wineskins vote to ask EPC for transitional presbytery for churches leaving PC(USA) at http://pres-outlook.net , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments http://pres-outlook.net Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:33:32 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://pres-outlook.net/news-and-analysis/1-news-a-analysis/4016.html#comment-3007 Welcome... there is room for you! God Bless and God Speed! - ken buck Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:00:00 +0100 http://pres-outlook.net/news-and-analysis/1-news-a-analysis/4016.html#comment-3005 The unanimous vote by the New Wineskins to ask the EPC for a transitional presbytery raises two serious questions for such inquirers. First concerns the future of female ordination beyond the five-year transitional period. The second concerns WCF 21.3 (the EPC's own confessional standard) which mandates prayer in a known tongue. I have always considered the EPC to be more charismatic in a technical sense. If they play 'loose' with this confessional standard, what will they do with the others? Those who consider themselves Reformed and Presbyterian need to proceed with great caution if they consider a step in this direction. - Sid Leak Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:00:00 +0100 http://pres-outlook.net/news-and-analysis/1-news-a-analysis/4016.html#comment-3001 Could someone point me to a resource that summarizes or could someone of authority in NWAC summarize the points of confessions and/or polity that differ between the NWI's proposed Confessions and the NWI/NWAC's endorsed Constitution, and the PCUSA's Book of Confessions and Book of Order? I have already noticed the difference in property trusts and that the NWI was/is not endorsing the inclusion of the PCUSA's The Confession of 1967 or A Brief Statement of Faith. Thanks for any help. - Cameron Mott Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:00:00 +0100