Become our Friend on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Font Size: +A -A RESET

the Outlook Blog

YOU ARE INVITED to participate in the Outlook Blog! This blog presents an ongoing opportunity for dialogue on matters of faith, theology, and ethics. You must be logged in to post, and our goal is to have this blog moderated by its users. Please direct questions concerning this blog to the webmaster via our Contact Us page.


Well the Presbyterian Church is finally getting around to marriage (see article on the marriage committee). Obviously, the unspoken context of the discussion is gay marriage. And I say, it's about time.

The progressives have always had it backwards -- strongly advocating for the ordination of a few gay activists before pressing for gay marriage for thousands. Gay marriage has always been a goal. (See the Covenant Network website, Jeffery Siker article.) Why hasn't it been the primary goal? Gay ordination would fall into place should gay marriage be blessed.

Whatever you feel about gay ordination, pro or con, Amendment B should not pass because it creates chaos and confusion.. The ordained gay officer and their partner would be put in limbo. The candidate, but not the partner, would pledge to presbytery to live, essentially in a marriage relationship. But the church, officially, would not recognize the relationship. This is a mess. The change to local option would also create mayhem and lawsuits as some presbyteries would reject ordained pastors from other presbyteries. Amendment B promotes chaos, confusion and mayhem and this -- and I use this word carefully -- is a sin.

To my traditional allies who oppose Amendment B, I say don't even mention sexual sin in your discussions at presbytery. No one is listening. For too many presbyters the justice/love hermeneutic trumps whatever we might say about Romans 1. Instead speak of the chaos and confusion this Amendment produces. There is no peace and unity with the passing of Amendment B -- just lawsuits, anguish and more division. And to my progressive friends I say, start over and do it right. Scrap the ill-conceived Amendment B and press for gay marriage if you must. Shouldn't this always have been the stated goal? For too long you have put the cart before the horse.

Rev. Paul Strand

Palos Verdes Estates, CA

 

 

 

 



Trackback(0)
Your Responses (0)Add Comment

Write a Response
smaller | bigger
NOTE: Your response to an article will be reviewed by staff before it is made available to the public for reading. The delay may be a few minutes or it may be as long as 24 hours.

busy
Banner
Join Our News Alerts Mailing List
Email:
Banner
Banner
Banner